Medical Law and Healthcare Governance in India: A Critical Study with Special Reference to Rajasthan

Authors

  • Akansha Rathi Research Scholar, Faculty of Law, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302041
  • Prof. (Dr.) Aradhana Parmar Supervisor, Faculty of Law, Maharishi Arvind University, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302041

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66304/IJGIMR.2026.v1i2.01

Keywords:

Medical Law, Healthcare Governance, Right to Health, Rajasthan, Medical Negligence, Health Policy, Patient Rights, Public Health Regulation, Article 21, Right to Health Act

Abstract

Medical law and healthcare governance occupy a crucial position in contemporary India because health is no longer viewed merely as a matter of charity, welfare, or administrative policy, but as an essential component of the right to life, human dignity, social justice, and constitutional governance. India has developed a wide network of laws, policies, regulatory bodies, schemes, judicial precedents, and professional standards governing healthcare services. However, the practical functioning of this framework reveals multiple conflicts between legal mandates, public health policies, regulatory institutions, private healthcare providers, medical professionals, patients, and the State. These conflicts become particularly visible in matters relating to access to healthcare, affordability, medical negligence, emergency treatment, regulation of private hospitals, patient rights, public health infrastructure, digital health records, biomedical waste, professional accountability, and implementation of health insurance schemes. The present article critically examines medical law and healthcare governance in India with special reference to the State of Rajasthan. Rajasthan is significant because it has attempted to move from a policy-based healthcare model towards a rights-based framework through the Rajasthan Right to Health Act, 2022. The Act represents a landmark attempt to recognise health as a legal entitlement at the State level. At the same time, its implementation raises complex questions regarding duties of the State, responsibilities of private healthcare establishments, reimbursement mechanisms, emergency care, grievance redressal, regulatory capacity, and financial sustainability. The article analyses constitutional principles, statutory laws, judicial decisions, health policies, professional regulations, and Rajasthan-specific developments to evaluate whether the existing governance framework adequately balances the rights of patients, duties of healthcare providers, and obligations of the State. The study concludes that India requires a more integrated, rights-based, transparent, accountable, and patient-centred healthcare governance model supported by strong regulation, adequate funding, digital safeguards, professional ethics, and effective grievance redressal.

References

Board of Governors in Supersession of the Medical Council of India. (2020). Telemedicine practice guidelines: Enabling registered medical practitioners to provide healthcare using telemedicine. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.

Central Pollution Control Board. (2016). Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India.

Consumer Protection Act, No. 35 of 2019, India.

Constitution of India. (1950). Government of India.

Digital Personal Data Protection Act, No. 22 of 2023, India.

Government of India. (2017). National Health Policy 2017. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Indian Medical Association v. V.P. Shantha, (1995) 6 SCC 651.

Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, (2005) 6 SCC 1.

Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, No. 34 of 1971, India.

Mental Healthcare Act, No. 10 of 2017, India.

National Health Authority. (2023). Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana and Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission: Policy and operational framework. Government of India.

National Medical Commission Act, No. 30 of 2019, India.

Parmanand Katara v. Union of India, (1989) 4 SCC 286.

Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal, (1996) 4 SCC 37.

Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, No. 57 of 1994,

India.

Rajasthan Right to Health Act, No. 7 of 2023, Rajasthan.

S. K. Jhunjhunwala v. Dhanwanti Kaur, (2019) 2 SCC 282.

The Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, No. 23 of 2010, India.

Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, No. 42 of 1994, India.

World Health Organization. (2021). Health systems governance for universal health coverage: Action plan

and policy guidance. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

Rathi, A., & Parmar, P. (Dr.) A. (2026). Medical Law and Healthcare Governance in India: A Critical Study with Special Reference to Rajasthan. International Journal of Global Innovations and Modern Research, 1(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.66304/IJGIMR.2026.v1i2.01

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.